First Responder Suicide – There Needs to be More than One Solution

My thoughts:

I believe there are at least 3 paths that lead to a First Responder contemplating / committing suicide. They are:

  1. Cumulative / Chronic Stress – Operational and/or Organizational
  2. Acute Stress – Critical Incident
  3. Poor Choices – Finances, Relationships, Substance Abuse, Risky Behaviors, etc.

I believe that suicide prevention / wellness training should be included in every academy, with follow-up training on a regular basis. However, once a First Responder is considered to be a risk to himself / herself, there needs to be an assessment to determine how and/or why the First Responder is in a potentially critical situation. Once that assessment is completed, a treatment strategy can be implemented.

Medical / First Responder Suicide Prevention Comparison (FRSPC)

Medical: There are steps a person can take to avoid getting cancer, e.g. avoid tobacco products, healthy diet, exercise, sleep 8 hours, etc.

FRSPC: There are steps First Responders can take to avoid getting to the point where they contemplate and/or commit suicide, e.g. healthy diet, exercise, vent appropriately, mindfulness practices, etc.

Medical: Once a person is diagnosed with cancer, the origin of the cancer needs to be identified in order to address the source of the disease.

FRSPC: Once a First Responder is identified as having a mental health issue, the origin of the issue needs to be identified in order to address the source of the issue.

Medical: The source (location) of the cancer often dictates what the best course of action  / treatment will be, e.g. chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation, etc.

FRSPC: The source of the mental health issue (cumulative stress. acute stress, poor choices etc.) should assist in identifying the best course of treatment. For example, a police officer who is in a mental health crisis because of an officer involved shooting would not / should not be treated the same as an officer who has violated state law.

Medical / FRSPC: In both cases, the patient’s / First Responder’s treatment should be monitored to see if it is having the desired effect. If not, adjustments, should be made. Once the disease and / or mental health crisis is resolved, the patient / First Responder should be monitored to ensure the disease and / or mental health issues have not resurfaced. Even a cancer patient that has been given a clean bill of health has yearly follow-up visits.

Final Considerations

  1. Do we take the time to properly diagnose the source of the First Responder’s mental health issues?
  2. Do we demand that each First Responder be given a unique treatment plan, based on his / her individual needs or so do we typically go with the one plan fits all?
  3. Do we monitor / communicate with the First Responder while they are going through treatment or do we purposely / unknowingly ostracize them?
  4. Once the First Responder is given a clean bill of health, do we require follow-up checks to ensure the issues have not resurfaced?

THERE ISN’T / SHOULD NOT BE 1 SOLUTION. OUR FIRST RESPONDERS DESERVE MORE THAN THAT!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this:
Skip to toolbar